Machines Are Friends, Not Foes.

Using Cognitive Computing to Interpret Data & Assess Threats

Popular movies, books and television shows typically position advanced technology as a threat to humanity and all we hold dear. We are shown a world in the future where the human condition has been irreversibly impacted in devastating and destructive ways due to the unintended consequences of building machines with cognitive capabilities.

Yet cognitive computing technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), natural language processing and augmented reality (AR) are seemingly omnipresent, promising huge benefits to companies and individuals alike.

I recently moderated a panel discussion with CIOs and CISOs from Fortune 500 companies where we discussed the positive impact that these new technologies are already providing to their various operations.

One analogy debated was the use of autopilots in the airline industry. Every single day millions of people are trusting cognitive computing as they are trusting pilots who are using autopilot to assist them with the more mundane parts of flying a plane. The group discussed the use of AI and ML to help CIOs and CISOs make more, better and faster decisions, but they are STILL making the decisions.

As digital transformation continues to move from buzzword to reality, there continues to be a massive increase in the amount of data available to assess. This data needs to be assessed to make the best business decisions as well as to prioritize which external security threats are the most critical to resolve or prevent.

In Miami, March 25th-28th a group of CIOs, CISOs and other C-level IT and security leaders will come together at the Digital Transformation Summit and further discuss how these cognitive computing technologies can be a “friend” and not a “foe”.

Notable presentations will include:

Join us at our Digital Transformation Summit in Miami on March 25th – 28th to discuss AI, ML and AR with your peers and others industry leaders.

Balancing the Four Pillars of Cybersecurity: Remediation, Vulnerability, Threat Intelligence & Deception

Unless you have totally unhooked from all media sources, not a day goes by that you are not exposed to a new cybersecurity existential threat or a successful nefarious hacking of a company’s data and records. It is a constant fight and a fight that has very serious ramifications if a company is on the losing end.

Adding to the complexity is the ongoing digital transformation of companies to meet the demands of both customers and employees. The need for instantaneous access to myriad pieces of data is seeing the rise of connected homes, offices and factories brought about by the Internet of Things (IoT). More data means more devices exposed to the threats of unwanted intruders.

CISOs and CIOs have many tools at their disposal, but typically not enough resources or time to deal with all of them. Technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning promise to provide Information security leaders with faster access to threats, but even with these tools the task of securing your employee and customer data can be daunting.

Generally, there are four pillars that security professionals are grappling with to solve this problem:

  • Remediation: Quickly respond to active threats and intrusions
  • Vulnerability: Using tools to identify the most glaring holes in systems and processes
  • Threat Intelligence: What are the most current threats happening at the current moment
  • Deception: Using camouflage to distract and confuse intruders

In Miami, March 25th-28th a group of CISOs and CIOs will come together at our Digital Transformation Summit to learn from each other as well as leading security technology providers and the best practices to balance these four pillars of cybersecurity architectures.

The presentations will include:

Join us at our Digital Transformation Summit in Miami on March 25th – 28th to network and collaborate with these industry experts.

Prospect from Leads to Leadership – Enterprise B2B Success

This week, I spoke to a marketing leader responsible for driving “enterprise level” opportunities for her sales team. She said her number one goal was to drive 10,000 leads this year. While I didn’t say anything, my mind wondered if there were actually 10,000 people that would fit their ideal customer profile. She further mentioned that they use tradeshows to hit that number, but noted that the sales team was not excited about the leads that tradeshows produced.

Following that discussion, I spoke to a sales leader who was responsible for closing “enterprise level” opportunities in the cybersecurity space. He said that while they get many leads from their marketing efforts, these leads generally aren’t sales qualified leads and don’t turn into closed deals.

This is today’s dilemma in enterprise B2B sales and marekting. There is an intense focus on driving leads, but yet research shows that over 90% of leads NEVER convert to a sale. We’ve found that there are two underlying reasons behind this dilemma:

  • Over 80% of executives who make purchasing decisions, prefer face-to-face meetings as the vehicle to learn about and then buy new solutions.
  • >90% of B2B Leads don’t result in a face-to-face meeting with an executive.

A 2016 study estimated $83 billion was spent on digital marketing and $26 billion was spent on B2B tradeshows for the purpose of driving leads. However, these leads are not valuable unless they turn into face-to-face meetings with the right people at the right companies.

Part of the issue lies in how success is measured. Cost per lead (CPL) drives a certain behavior focused on simply driving leads. Customer acquisition costs (CAC) or cost per acquisition (CPA) have the promise of uniting marketing and sales into a common measurement, but can still lead to organizational finger pointing.  Account-based marketing (ABM) at least jointly focuses marketing and sales on the right companies, but ABM doesn’t guarantee what both sides of the buying/selling equation want – face-to-face discussions.

To be a leader in today’s enterprise B2B world, one needs to move from leads driven by measurements and instead driving face-to-face meetings with the right people. Maybe it is time to have a new measurement: cost per face-to-face meeting (CPF2FM).  Maybe that is a measurement that can truly unite sales and marketing.

CDM Media helps sales and marketing leaders grow their revenue through a Sales Acceleration Platform that drives face-to-face meetings and discussions between their company and C-suite executives from their target markets.

Why Tradeshows Rarely Work

Selling a complex solution to a Fortune 1000 Enterprise is extremely difficult. Whether you approach the enterprise sales dilemma from a marketing point of view or from a sales point of view, the process can be both long and frustrating. Over the past 10 years of being immersed in the enterprise B2B sales ecosystem, CDM Media has learned three key points:

  1. The sales cycle, from the first touch (by phone or email) to the contract signature, can be frustratingly long. Our research shows that the average length of a complex solution sale cycle ranges from 12-18 months.
  2. The idea that there is a single decision maker is truly a myth – they don’t exist.  Instead, on average, 5+ people need to approve a purchase of a new complex solution.
  3. Up to 50% of this lengthy sales cycle is spent working to get a face-to-face meeting with one of those 5+ decision makers.

This process has led to the short life cycles of those held most responsible for building a robust pipeline of highly qualified opportunities for the sales team.  Studies show that CMOs and VPs of Marketing have a corporate shelf life that is nearly half as long (or should I say short) as the rest of the C-suite.  In spite of myriad marketing automation tools, massive amounts of creative content, cold calling tools and techniques, account based marketing and the rise of social media marketing, the sales cycle is what it is — long.  And the sales cycle can be as long as the average tenure of a CMO — 18 months.

We have seen some try to solve this through meeting one of these 5+ Decision Makers at large B2B tradeshows or exhibitions, but these seem to rarely work.  What are the odds that a C-level decision maker is attending a tradeshow and even if they do, what are the odds they will drop by your booth and engage in a 30-minute detailed discussion?

While the numbers tell a story that can seem troubling there is a number that brings hope: